From b62c248e5d5db7c2eed430a477b8285e35551bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <11767-anoduck@users.noreply.gitgud.io> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: Finally emails working now --- static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+) create mode 100644 static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html (limited to 'static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html') diff --git a/static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html b/static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..59ac910 --- /dev/null +++ b/static/emails/CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + + + + Email Message: CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt.html + + + + + + + +

clarification on appeal process

+
+---
+author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
+subject: clarification on appeal process
+message-id: CAGiqvQxT1AaZ4Rt
+date: 2024-01-03
+---
+
+ +

We have not retained the services of a leXXl professional, since previously +we were completely oblivious to the option of formally appealing decisions +made by the Zoning Administrator. After learning of the option, it became +apparent we have not fully exhausted the administrative options available +to us by the county to resolve the issue. Granting the County an +opportunity to honor its own oXXinance is best established in leXXl +precedents. Had we known about the option to formally submit an appeal, we +would have done so with every complaint we have submitted since 2020, +because it was then we beXXn to endure continuous violation after violation +of county oXXinance and a refusal to enforce them. ReXXXXless, the presence +of leXXl counsel, or lack thereof, should not inhibit the appeals process +in any way or cause it to stall.

+

Since none of the parties involved deny work beXXn at multiple job sites in +the beginning of October without obtaining a building permit, it would be +of great service if stop work oXXers could be served to the contractor in +oXXer for our property to avoid incurring further damage from trespass +during this process.

+

Thank you for the response, I hope you have a wonderful day.

+

+XXXXXXX XXXXXX

+

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024, 9:16 AM L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com +wrote:

+
+

XXXXXXX,

+

In an earlier email to Ms. Buice, you said you would have your attorney +contact her. If you are represented by an attorney, the rules of the State +Bar of XXXXXXX prohibit me from speaking directly with you concerning this +matter. Can you have your attorney call or email me?

+

Thanks.

+

Sincerely,

+

L. Scott Mayfield +Attorney at Law

+

O. 770-358-XX30 | F. 770-358-XX40 +XXX Thomaston Street | XXXXXXXXXXX, GA 30204 +www.smithwelchlaw.com +Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement

+

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for +the sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential +information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to +leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, +please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, +notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all +copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client +relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No +attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer +agreement. Thank you.

+

From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com +Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 4:30 PM +To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com +Subject: Clarification on appeal process

+

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click +links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the +content is safe.

+

Scott,

+

I am trying to formally appeal the issuance of building permits to KaXXun +Home, and it is unclear where I am supposed to send the appeal. I submitted +a very rough draft to the zoning administrator on December the 22nd to meet +the deadline, and have not received a response.

+

KaXXun Homes beXXn construction on a subdivision beside our home without a +building permit several weeks ago. The Zoning Administrator did nothing for +two weeks, then two weeks later, granted a building permit without penalty +for the previous violations. Since every day work is performed constitutes +a new and separate violation and it is beyond the scope of the Zoning +Administrator to dismiss violations or cherry pick when oXXinance applies, +this renders said permit void. Yet, no stop work oXXer or temporary +injunction has ever been submitted to the contractor.

+

I am trying to perform due diligence in allowing the county to handle this +infraction. I need the county to honor it's own oXXinances, and shutdown +permitless construction activities. This failure to enforce oXXinances has +put my family in a very bad position.

+

XXXXXXX XXXXXX +

+
+

References

+

['CAGiqvQn6xg4dCzTD']

+

Reply-To

+

None

+
+

Back

+
+

:END:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3