Email Message: CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html

From c2f904ec773acecabb34c68b0e6756f3f8cc305b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:01:38 -0500 Subject: feat(content): :sparkles: Communication section creation Communication section created, frontmatter type cleaning, configurations, etc... #28 #27 --- static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html | 105 ----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 105 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html (limited to 'static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html') diff --git a/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html b/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html deleted file mode 100644 index 72b4f5b..0000000 --- a/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,105 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - Email Message: CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html - - - - - - - -

fwd: clarification on appeal process

----
-author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
-subject: fwd: clarification on appeal process
-message-id: CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R
-date: 2024-02-09
----
-

- -

---------- ForwaXXed message --------- -From: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com -Date: Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:16 AM -Subject: RE: Clarification on appeal process -To: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com

XXXXXXX,

In an earlier email to Ms. Buice, you said you would have your attorney -contact her. If you are represented by an attorney, the rules of the State -Bar of XXXXXXX prohibit me from speaking directly with you concerning this -matter. Can you have your attorney call or email me?

Thanks.

Sincerely,

L. Scott Mayfield -Attorney at Law

O. 770-358-XX30 | F. 770-358-XX40 -XXX Thomaston Street | XXXXXXXXXXX, GA 30204 -www.smithwelchlaw.com -Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for the -sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential -information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to -leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, -please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, -notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all -copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client -relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No -attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer -agreement. Thank you.

From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com -Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 4:30 PM -To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com -Subject: Clarification on appeal process

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click links -or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is -safe.

Scott,

I am trying to formally appeal the issuance of building permits to KaXXun -Home, and it is unclear where I am supposed to send the appeal. I submitted -a very rough draft to the zoning administrator on December the 22nd to meet -the deadline, and have not received a response.

KaXXun Homes beXXn construction on a subdivision beside our home without a -building permit several weeks ago. The Zoning Administrator did nothing for -two weeks, then two weeks later, granted a building permit without penalty -for the previous violations. Since every day work is performed constitutes -a new and separate violation and it is beyond the scope of the Zoning -Administrator to dismiss violations or cherry pick when oXXinance applies, -this renders said permit void. Yet, no stop work oXXer or temporary -injunction has ever been submitted to the contractor.

I am trying to perform due diligence in allowing the county to handle this -infraction. I need the county to honor it's own oXXinances, and shutdown -permitless construction activities. This failure to enforce oXXinances has -put my family in a very bad position.

XXXXXXX XXXXXX

References

['CAGiqvQn6xg4dCzTD']

Reply-To

None

Back

:END:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3