From b62c248e5d5db7c2eed430a477b8285e35551bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <11767-anoduck@users.noreply.gitgud.io> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: Finally emails working now --- static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html (limited to 'static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html') diff --git a/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html b/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bbd2b8d --- /dev/null +++ b/static/emails/CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +
+ ++--- +author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX +subject: fwd: clarification on appeal process +message-id: CAGiqvQnuRxKA3F6R +date: 2024-02-09 +--- ++ +
---------- ForwaXXed message --------- +From: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com +Date: Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:16 AM +Subject: RE: Clarification on appeal process +To: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com
+XXXXXXX,
+In an earlier email to Ms. Buice, you said you would have your attorney +contact her. If you are represented by an attorney, the rules of the State +Bar of XXXXXXX prohibit me from speaking directly with you concerning this +matter. Can you have your attorney call or email me?
+Thanks.
+Sincerely,
+L. Scott Mayfield +Attorney at Law
+O. 770-358-XX30 | F. 770-358-XX40 +XXX Thomaston Street | XXXXXXXXXXX, GA 30204 +www.smithwelchlaw.com +Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement
+CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for the +sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential +information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to +leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, +please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, +notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all +copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client +relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No +attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer +agreement. Thank you.
+From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com +Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 4:30 PM +To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com +Subject: Clarification on appeal process
+CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click links +or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is +safe.
+Scott,
+I am trying to formally appeal the issuance of building permits to KaXXun +Home, and it is unclear where I am supposed to send the appeal. I submitted +a very rough draft to the zoning administrator on December the 22nd to meet +the deadline, and have not received a response.
+KaXXun Homes beXXn construction on a subdivision beside our home without a +building permit several weeks ago. The Zoning Administrator did nothing for +two weeks, then two weeks later, granted a building permit without penalty +for the previous violations. Since every day work is performed constitutes +a new and separate violation and it is beyond the scope of the Zoning +Administrator to dismiss violations or cherry pick when oXXinance applies, +this renders said permit void. Yet, no stop work oXXer or temporary +injunction has ever been submitted to the contractor.
+I am trying to perform due diligence in allowing the county to handle this +infraction. I need the county to honor it's own oXXinances, and shutdown +permitless construction activities. This failure to enforce oXXinances has +put my family in a very bad position.
+XXXXXXX XXXXXX
+None
+:END:
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3