---- -author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX -subject: a matter of clarification, please -message-id: CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T -date: 2024-03-07 ---- -- -
That does not bode well, and leads to the suspicion of there being a -conflict of interest.
-I don't know where you got the 15 day deadline, because on municode, which -is the link provided by the county, the oXXinance reads 30 days.
-On the same page, it says appeals can be raised by any aggrieved member of -the community. It says nothing of the members standing. Since the offences -are committed aXXinst the county, then the individual who is appealing a -self admitted breach of OXXinance should not matter. Standing does not -dictate ethicality, nor interfere with the counties obliXXtion to enforce -penalties and violations. What it summates to is county sanctioned illeXXl -building practices.
-The developers had to have known before hand the status of my grandmother's -estate, it is the only thing that can explain their reckless and obvious -intentional violation of state law. Standing can be rectified, building a -house without a valid permit cannot. Formulation of machinations in oXXer -to perform intentional negligence, most certainly cannot.
-There is another subdivision behind us, it too has egregiously violated -state law, and even encroached on our property knowingly so. Obviously, -someone must have told him the same thing about the estate. This would mean -there is communication and cooXXination between the two parties. Someone -had to tell them all, and there are a finite number of people who could -have done so.
-The entire oXXeal revolves around ethical duty, not leXXl maneuverability. -Cheating and cutting corners is no way to do the right thing, no matter the -desired result.
-Now you know the reason for asking. A terrible wrong has been done to my -family, and I am obliXXted by duty to rectify this injustice, leXXlly and -ethically.
-XXXXXXX
-On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 2:37 PM L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com -wrote:
---I am not going to answer this.
-Sincerely,
-L. Scott Mayfield
-Attorney at Law
-O.770-358-XX30
-|
-F. 770-358-XX40
-XXX Thomaston Street
-|
-XXXXXXXXXXX
-,
-GA
-30204
-www.smithwelchlaw.com
-Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement
-CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for -the sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential -information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to -leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, -please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, -notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all -copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client -relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No -attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer -agreement. Thank you.
-From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com -Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 6:57 AM -To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com; -rtraylor@lamarcountyXX.com; XXXXXX XXXXXX aXXXXXX@lamarcountyXX.com; -Mom Elisa XXXXXX gratefulXXXXenur@gmail.com -Subject: A matter of clarification, please
-CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click -links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the -content is safe.
-Scott,
-Are you currently representing or retained by any of the following:
--
-- Erica Tyler
-- Don Simmons
-- Denny Dunn
-- Brent McDaniel
-- Doug Matthews
-- Matthew Dayton
-As this would represent a conflict of interest, and someone is obviously -counseling these individuals, and performing the leXXl work needed for the -exchange of land. There are only two real estate attorneys in town that I -am aware of, and your response primarily protects their interests.
-XXXXXXX -
-
None
-:END:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3