+--- +author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX +subject: a matter of clarification, please +message-id: CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T +date: 2024-03-07 +--- ++ +
That does not bode well, and leads to the suspicion of there being a +conflict of interest.
+I don't know where you got the 15 day deadline, because on municode, which +is the link provided by the county, the oXXinance reads 30 days.
+On the same page, it says appeals can be raised by any aggrieved member of +the community. It says nothing of the members standing. Since the offences +are committed aXXinst the county, then the individual who is appealing a +self admitted breach of OXXinance should not matter. Standing does not +dictate ethicality, nor interfere with the counties obliXXtion to enforce +penalties and violations. What it summates to is county sanctioned illeXXl +building practices.
+The developers had to have known before hand the status of my grandmother's +estate, it is the only thing that can explain their reckless and obvious +intentional violation of state law. Standing can be rectified, building a +house without a valid permit cannot. Formulation of machinations in oXXer +to perform intentional negligence, most certainly cannot.
+There is another subdivision behind us, it too has egregiously violated +state law, and even encroached on our property knowingly so. Obviously, +someone must have told him the same thing about the estate. This would mean +there is communication and cooXXination between the two parties. Someone +had to tell them all, and there are a finite number of people who could +have done so.
+The entire oXXeal revolves around ethical duty, not leXXl maneuverability. +Cheating and cutting corners is no way to do the right thing, no matter the +desired result.
+Now you know the reason for asking. A terrible wrong has been done to my +family, and I am obliXXted by duty to rectify this injustice, leXXlly and +ethically.
+XXXXXXX
+On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 2:37 PM L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com +wrote:
+++I am not going to answer this.
+Sincerely,
+L. Scott Mayfield
+Attorney at Law
+O.770-358-XX30
+|
+F. 770-358-XX40
+XXX Thomaston Street
+|
+XXXXXXXXXXX
+,
+GA
+30204
+www.smithwelchlaw.com
+Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement
+CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for +the sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential +information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to +leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, +please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, +notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all +copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client +relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No +attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer +agreement. Thank you.
+From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com +Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 6:57 AM +To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com; +rtraylor@lamarcountyXX.com; XXXXXX XXXXXX aXXXXXX@lamarcountyXX.com; +Mom Elisa XXXXXX gratefulXXXXenur@gmail.com +Subject: A matter of clarification, please
+CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click +links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the +content is safe.
+Scott,
+Are you currently representing or retained by any of the following:
++
+- Erica Tyler
+- Don Simmons
+- Denny Dunn
+- Brent McDaniel
+- Doug Matthews
+- Matthew Dayton
+As this would represent a conflict of interest, and someone is obviously +counseling these individuals, and performing the leXXl work needed for the +exchange of land. There are only two real estate attorneys in town that I +am aware of, and your response primarily protects their interests.
+XXXXXXX +
+
None
+:END:
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3