nuclear deterrence via real estate - the inevitable cyclical scenario - we tried to avoid.
----- -author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX -subject: nuclear deterrence via real estate - the inevitable cyclical scenario - we tried to avoid. -message-id: CAGiqvQmZhS1x9uFJ -date: 2024-04-10 ---- -- -
What I do not understand about this sorted wretched affair is that the -antagonists either do not understand or do not care what the end result is -destined to be. The inevitable conclusion will be a scenario very similar -to nuclear deterrence, but instead of using nuclear warheads to inflict -damage, land use will be the means to inflict damage. Similarly, this -deterrence based on land use is cyclically escalatory in nature, and there -are little to no barriers preventing non-combatant casualties. AccoXXing to -John Smith's XXme theory, this has the highest probability of resulting in -a no win situation for all factions involved, and every participating -entity will more than likely incur heavy losses in one way or another. This -was from the beginning completely unnecessary and avoidable. No external -source forced the antagonistic parties into action, especially in the -unlawful and completely deplorable manner in which they acted. If they had -simply concerned themselves with acting with integrity, severed themselves -from greed and misdirected hate, no one would have been bothered and it -would have been for the better.
-This also could have been completely avoided by the county, as the county -possesses the ability and duty to enforce the laws of the state of XXXXXXX, -reXXXXless of the private citizens standing. Standing only affects one's -ability to bring forth action in the court, it does not shed personal -liability of officials, and especially it does not prevent the county from -enforcing state law and the laws it legislated itself only a year or two -ago. As protection and enforcement of the law is required by law. The -offense is not aXXinst the people on the adjoining properties, but aXXinst -the county as the leXXl representative body of the citizens of Lamar County -for the state of XXXXXXX. The offenses of violating state law, are aXXinst -the citizens of the state of XXXXXXX, who have invested obliXXtory -authority to the county. If the county refuses to enforce the laws of the -state, the county violates the trust invested in it by the state. -Furthermore, none of this prevents perfectly leXXl retributionary action -from occurring outside of the formal system of the courts.
-Frankly, the current position of 'we are going to do whatever we want, -disreXXXX state law, constitutional rights, and you can't do anything about -it' is the worst stance for the county to take. As it completely decimates -the integrity of the county, and portrays the county as corrupt, -dictatorial, and authoritarian. It also establishes a dangerous precedent -in the county as to what is seen as acceptable business practice, and -leaves the county completely open to future accusations of corruption, -favoritism, bias, and discrimination. Additionally, as much as people would -like to believe their personal integrity is limitless and separate from the -orXXnizational body in which they are a member of, nothing could be further -from the truth. Subconsciously, the individual will always be associated -and viewed as an extension of the orXXnizational entity in which they are a -member of. Thus is the reason, by nature, accountability must be diligently -enforced and upheld in orXXnizational bodies, because the actions of one -affect the integrity of all.
-It is needless to say, if the county's interests are to promote business -investment in the community, then by refusing to enforce the law the county -is directly in conflict with this interest. Obviously, any business owner -would be considered foolish for investing in a region with a governing -entity that is known to refuse to enforce its own law and repeatedly have -disreXXXXed the investment made by residing citizens. The only businesses -that would invest in a region with this questionable track recoXX are the -types of businesses that are least desirable and whose lifespan is most -volatile. This is because the corporate culture of those businesses are not -invested in profitability in the long term, but rather fly-by-night schemes -that revolve around consumer deception and circumvention of leXXl -requirements. As their methods of achieving profitability rely upon the -requirement to leave ruin in their wake for someone else to pay for. These -methods are not community beneficial, they are community exploitive. The -only group protected by the county's decision are the same people who -violated the law to begin with. Literally, they are being rewaXXed for -breaking the law, and using the county as a pawn.
-The other thing that I do not understand is, what exactly do they expect us -to do? Do they seriously think we are just going to sit here, not ask any -questions, and accept we are being screwed over? Do they seriously think -our attention span is so finite that we will forget what has been done to -us anytime within the recent future? It seems that they never concerned -themselves with reflection on the long term consequences, or what type of -leXXcy it will leave behind.
-Bill Linsey was the lawyer for the real estate sale between Doug and -Matthew Dayton. He also was the Lawyer for Abernathy on numerous occasions, -and attempted to represent both the county and Abernathy in the Solar -issue. It is unknown exactly who, but it is highly likely leXXl counsel -advised much of what has been done to us, and aided in the circumvention of -both the law and accountability. We also have suspicions of being -informally black listed on multiple fronts. As it is all routinely too -convenient for coincidence.
-XXXXXXX
-:END:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3