From b62c248e5d5db7c2eed430a477b8285e35551bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <11767-anoduck@users.noreply.gitgud.io> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: Finally emails working now --- static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html (limited to 'static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html') diff --git a/static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html b/static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e1d4051 --- /dev/null +++ b/static/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + + + Email Message: CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html + + + + + + + +

current concerns

+
+---
+author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
+subject: current concerns
+message-id: CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK
+date: 2024-03-08
+---
+
+ +

I directly asked Mr. Mayfield if he was currently representing any of the +parties involved in the land development out here, and explained my +reasoning for doing so, which were reasonable. He refused to answer, +stating "I am not going to answer this." There is no estoppel preventing +response, and a simple two letter response would have sufficed, but none +was offered. Even if he was offended by the inquiry, it still would have +been better to clear the air of suspicion, than allow it to linger and +raise questions of impropriety. Outside of a court of law, that could oXXer +such questions be answered, this is about as close to a confirmation of a +conflict of interest as you can get.

+

Once I calmed down from the initial shock of the response, I beXXn to look +at the response more closely. There are discrepancies concerning appeal +deadline and requirements. His response primarily is concerned with +preventing interference in what has become an illeXXl construction +operation.

+

Although it may seem abidance to oXXinance is a small matter, it is a +precursor to fraud. OXXinance violations must be penalized by law, +unsettled penalties nullify the validity of permits whether the county +allows it or not, and homes built without valid permits are worth less. +Unsettled building violations MUST BE DISCLOSED TO BUYERS BY LAW, or be +found liable for fraud. Knowingly allowing such violations and refusing to +do anything about it would make someone an accessory to fraud.

+

ReXXXXless of any conception of standing, no judge in the country will look +favorably on premeditated violation of state law in oXXer to defraud +consumers by performing illeXXl construction work, neither will any media +outlet for that matter. This is why it is so dire that the county rectify +its course and stop these illeXXl buildings practices. The bigger this scam +becomes, the more harm it will cause when it falls. That is something you +can bet the farm on, because I literally am.

+

If nothing is done and the county doesn't rectify it's course, it will be +time the media and social networks hear about Lamar's county sanctioned +illeXXl building project, and of the potential or confirmed involvement of +county officials in the affair.

+

XXXXXXX XXXXXX +XXX XXXXXXXX XX +XXXXXXXXXXX, XX 30204 +XXX XXXXXXX

+

References

+

Reply-To

+
+

Back

+
+

:END:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3