From f0547c58ec14beeaf3d15ad7e03166dcfb9af991 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:09:29 -0400 Subject: docs: Added content, updated mods Added pages on mail tampering, Italy banning solar, qs and as, and corrected markdown formatting error. --- content/_index.md | 2 +- content/communication/usps-request.md | 36 +++++++ content/docs/development-1.md | 27 +++++ content/docs/development-2.md | 24 +++++ content/docs/questionsandanswers.md | 31 ++++++ content/evidence/mail-tampering.md | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++ content/evidence/timeline.md | 4 +- content/legal/mail-statutes.md | 35 ++++++ .../italy-ban-solar-powerplants-on-farmland.md | 39 +++++++ content/persons/_index.md | 20 +--- 10 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) create mode 100644 content/communication/usps-request.md create mode 100644 content/docs/development-1.md create mode 100644 content/docs/development-2.md create mode 100644 content/docs/questionsandanswers.md create mode 100644 content/evidence/mail-tampering.md create mode 100644 content/legal/mail-statutes.md create mode 100644 content/news/italy-ban-solar-powerplants-on-farmland.md (limited to 'content') diff --git a/content/_index.md b/content/_index.md index b92ab07..22205f7 100644 --- a/content/_index.md +++ b/content/_index.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- title: Corrupt Lamar -description: "How a group of individuals persecuted our family and violated the law in order to run out of the county, and the county out of millions." +description: "How a group of individuals persecuted our family and violated the law in order to run us out of the county, and the county out of millions." thumbnail: url: img/logo-lg.png actions: diff --git a/content/communication/usps-request.md b/content/communication/usps-request.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..376b8fe --- /dev/null +++ b/content/communication/usps-request.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +--- +title: USPS Request +description: A request to investigate tampering with the mail was submitted. +date: 2023-05-10T21:33:36.000Z +metadata: full +categories: Communication +tags: + - inspection + - mail + - postal service + - tampering +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742506360/Communication/United-States-Postal-Service-Logo-1970-1993.png +type: docs +draft: false +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: communication +--- + +A request to investigate the potential theft of our letters mailed to William Earl Dayton was submitted to the United States +Postal Inspectors Office. Below is the confirmation response. + +```text +This Service Request XXXXX295 has been forwarded and is currently being reviewed by the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). + +The Postal Inspection Service is the law enforcement of the United States Postal Service. Complaints alleging mail tampering or theft come under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Postal Inspection Service. This inquiry does not require you to contact either the Inspection Service or the Postal Service. A Postal Inspection Service representative will contact you if this inquiry requires further investigation. + +Please note, information provided in a mail theft complaint and reviewed by the Inspection Service does not always result in a criminal investigation. + +We appreciate you reporting this issue. + +Regards, + +United States Postal Service +``` + diff --git a/content/docs/development-1.md b/content/docs/development-1.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d186106 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/docs/development-1.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +--- +title: "Development Site #1" +description: "Specifics of Development site #1." +date: 2025-03-09T05:40:13.743Z +metadata: full +categories: Docs +tags: + - Development + - Site 1 +thumbnail: "" +type: docs +draft: true +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: docs +--- + +Title: +Size: +Location: +Total Estimated Sum of Fines: +Target Development: +Previous Owners: +Current Developer: +Features: + + diff --git a/content/docs/development-2.md b/content/docs/development-2.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..22b5fb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/docs/development-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +--- +title: "Development Site #2" +description: "" +date: 2025-03-09T05:43:06.118Z +metadata: full +categories: Docs +tags: [] +thumbnail: "" +type: docs +draft: true +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: docs +--- +Title: +Size: +Location: +Total Estimated Sum of Fines: +Target Development: +Previous Owners: +Current Developer: +Features: + + diff --git a/content/docs/questionsandanswers.md b/content/docs/questionsandanswers.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2a7ce9b --- /dev/null +++ b/content/docs/questionsandanswers.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +--- +title: Questions and Answers +description: Question and Answer format of discussions pertaining to our persecution. +date: 2025-03-08T09:35:52.120Z +metadata: full +categories: Docs +tags: + - barnesville + - persecution + - questions + - Lamar +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1741427134/docs/photo-1644523877142-a837fb9cfc20.jpg +type: docs +draft: true +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: docs +--- + +{{< accordion id="qanda" >}} + {{< accordion-item header="What makes this different than any other normal and simple quarrel between neighbors?" show=true >}} + In short, a lot. + {{< /accordion-item >}} + {{< accordion-item header="" >}} + If Chuck Norris were to travel to an alternate dimension in which there was another Chuck Norris and they both fought, they would both win. What’s the strongest part of Chuck Norris? His opinion. Chuck Norris drinks napalm to fight his heartburn. When Chuck Norris writes, he makes paper bleed. Chuck Norris can clap with one hand. + {{< /accordion-item >}} + {{< accordion-item header="" >}} + Chuck Norris tells Simon what to do. Chuck Norris doesn’t wear a watch. He decides what time it is. M.C. Hammer learned the hard way that Chuck Norris can touch this. Chuck Norris knows Victoria’s secret. Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird. + {{< /accordion-item >}} +{{< /accordion >}} + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ace152c --- /dev/null +++ b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +--- +title: Isn't that something called "Tampering with the mail"? +description: Request made to investigate tampering with the U.S.P.S. Mail. +date: 2022-09-19T19:00:00.000Z +metadata: full +categories: Evidence +tags: + - law + - accountability +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742464545/Communication/photo-1694442480933-fd8032cbef30.jpg +type: docs +draft: false +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: evidence +--- + +## Suspicion + +We had always been suspicious as to why our former neighbor of forty five years never responded to any of our inquiries concerning +the property he had owned across the street from us. The reasons for the suspicion were, + +1. We were already concerned about his well being, since we had not seen him in several months. +2. We knew the fire chief was residing at his home, had not purchased it, and was intentionally preventing anyone from + finding out. +3. We knew information about the future of the property was intentionally being witheld from us. Which constitutes an + intention to decieve. + +Then the fire chief disclosed he was aware of the contents of these letters, which he did not have a right to. They were +private communications between Mr. Dayton and ourself. No one else had permission to read them, not even Mr. Dayton's +son Matthews. + +## Possibilities + +So this left us with one of three possibilities as to how Doug Matthews acquired knowledge of the content of those +letters. + +1. Mr. Dayton read them and did not respond, but yet told Doug about the contents. +2. Doug intercepted the letters and read them himself. +3. Mr. Dayton's son intercepted the letters, and informed Doug. + + We could easily dismiss one of those possibilities, Mr. Dayton would not have shared that information with +Doug, and if possibile Mr. Dayton would have responded if he had actually recieved them. Mr. Dayton was a businessman, +and especially as one who started out in sales, he took care of business, and was one to communicate. Which meant +probability favored Mr. Dayton never recieved those letters. This did not answer how Doug was informed on the content +of those letters, but it did bring up another important inquiry. If Mr. Dayton did not recieve them, who did? + +## The role of Covid + +There is one other point of information which supports the scenario that Mr. Dayton never informed Doug about the +content of our letters to him. Mr. Dayton was hospitalized with covid 19 during the height of the epidemic. The method +for treating covid patients at that time was to place them under strict quarantine and when needed place them on a +respirator. Since Doug is in no way related to Mr. Dayton, he would not qualify to recieve any visitation rights. + +So, it was not possible for Doug to even see Mr. Dayton at the time. This meant that either someone else was granting Doug +permission to begin liquidating Mr. Dayton's assets and live on his property rent free, Doug was doing so unlawfully +as a squatter, or most likely a combination of both. Either way, Mr. Dayton had a pack of grandchildren, who appear to have been +cheated out of part of their inheritance by our county's second highest ranking public safety officer. + +## Inheritance is sentimental + +Inheritance is more than just monetary possession, it's deeply sentimental and personal. Doug living in his house before +his passing, would have robbed them of their privacy, any chance of purchasing the property themselves, and any chance +to claim anything they deamed sentimental. Considering the greediness and crookedness in which every aspect of this has +unfolded, it is certain the entire purpose for him to have moved onto Dayton's property in a clandestine manner was to +do exactly this, cheat Mr. Dayton's relatives out of their inheritance. + +Only a very cunning and ultimately crooked legal counselor could have advised Doug on how to do this without being held +in negligence. This is where county commissioner Truman Boyle and his associate, the county attorney Scott Mayfield most +likely played a role. Because someone had to be giving Doug legal advice, and no attorney would assisst a complete +stranger in planning out a means to cheat a family out of their inheritance. Which meant Doug had to have known the +attorney personally. Since his father-in-law is friends with Scott, Scott attends the same church as Doug, Scott is +the county attorney, and has a history of disregarding matters which possess a conflict of interest. So, Scott was +obviously the best fit for this role. + +## Sons + +So, returning to what happened to those letters. this leaves us with either Doug intercepted the letters or one of Mr. +Dayton's sons acquired possession of them. So the next step was finding out about how to contact Mr. Dayton's sons. + +Research was performed in an attempt to locate contact information for Mr. Dayton's sons. One was out in Texas, most of +them were living close to one another in Atlanta, and his youngest son Matt was living here in town at the exact same +address as his father was listed as living. So, by mailing the letters to his father, they also arrived at Matt's +residence. This increased the possibility of Matt having intercepted them, and decreased the likelihood of Doug having +performed the interception out of practicality. + +There is one other piece of information supporting this scenario, Mr. Dayton's oldest son, Bill Dayton, was contacted to +inquire about what had happened to the letters mailed to his father. Over the very brief correspondance that took place, +three things came across most evident. + +1. There was an undercurrent of agitation over the subject. +2. Regardless of being Mr. Dayton's oldest, and having been a former employee of his father's business, + Bill was somehow disassociated with the estate. It appears the other brothers, except Matt, were as well. +3. He was completely unaware of the numerous attempts to contact his father, and knew nothing of Doug liquidating the + estate. + +This left us with the highest possible scenario being, Matt intercepted the letters, opened them, and then informed Doug +of their contents. Mr. Dayton died completely unaware that his neighbor of forty five years was desperately trying to +reach him to save his own home from what inevitably was to come. Afterwards, they more than likely were disposed in the +trash, a symbol of what his son did to a life long friendship. + +## Legality + +Within all of this are two federal felonies to add to the list: + +1. Obstruction of Correspondence [^2] +2. Delay or Destruction of Mail or Newspapers [^3] + +By intercepting the letters and not informing his father of their existence, Matt Dayton obstructed a critical +correspondence between us and his father, and then by destroying and/or refusing to forward then to his father, he +destroyed the mail. + +We are constantly confounded by the unwillingness of law enforcement to do anything about this illegal sham. + +[^1]: https://legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-open-someone-elses-mailbox/ +[^2]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702 +[^3]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1703 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/evidence/timeline.md b/content/evidence/timeline.md index 8d803f0..5161b23 100644 --- a/content/evidence/timeline.md +++ b/content/evidence/timeline.md @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ categories: draft: false fmContentType: evidence modules: timelinejs +alias: + - docs/timeline --- > [!WARNING] @@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ modules: timelinejs ---- -__TimelineJs Should be rendered below__ +TimelineJs Should be rendered below: {{< timelinejs blockId="timeline-content" tlData="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSoEV-bT1CXcTsWDUX8ubyBH1hFb0DrokqJAfc66DQfpVBxv7JZKIPwZ3SzjBBFTADw4NAy-NvOtzma/pubhtml" >}} diff --git a/content/legal/mail-statutes.md b/content/legal/mail-statutes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9956859 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/legal/mail-statutes.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +--- +title: Mail Statutes +description: Applicable mail statutes regarding the letter sent to former property owner., +date: 2025-03-20T19:22:34.005Z +tags: + - law + - statutes + - legal +categories: Legal +type: docs +draft: false +alias: [] +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742465259/legal/photo-1725975179809-396e67ee30a4.jpg +fmContentType: legal +--- + +## 18 U.S. Code § 1702 - Obstruction of correspondence + +Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. +(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.) + + + +## 18 U.S. Code § 1703 - Delay or destruction of mail or newspapers + +(a) Whoever, being a Postal Service officer or employee, unlawfully secretes, destroys, detains, delays, or opens any letter, postal card, package, bag, or mail entrusted to him or which shall come into his possession, and which was intended to be conveyed by mail, or carried or delivered by any carrier or other employee of the Postal Service, or forwarded through or delivered from any post office or station thereof established by authority of the Postmaster General or the Postal Service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. +(b) Whoever, being a Postal Service officer or employee, improperly detains, delays, or destroys any newspaper, or permits any other person to detain, delay, or destroy the same, or opens, or permits any other person to open, any mail or package of newspapers not directed to the office where he is employed; or + +Whoever, without authority, opens, or destroys any mail or package of newspapers not directed to him, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. +(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 778; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 37, 63 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 91–375, § 6(j)(16), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(B), (G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146, 2147.) + + +[^1]: https://legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-open-someone-elses-mailbox/ +[^2]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702 +[^3]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1703 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/news/italy-ban-solar-powerplants-on-farmland.md b/content/news/italy-ban-solar-powerplants-on-farmland.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4d325ee --- /dev/null +++ b/content/news/italy-ban-solar-powerplants-on-farmland.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +--- +title: Italy provides some vindication. +description: Italy bans the exact same type of solar power plant we were persecuted for opposing. +date: 2024-07-07T04:54:59.000Z +type: default +categories: Post +tags: + - bullshit + - farms + - Italy + - solar + - persecution +draft: false +alias: [] +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742531034/photo-1740853497808-adbfbebfa981_mik39c.jpg +fmContentType: news +--- + +We have always ascribed blame for the way we have been treated on our opposition of a solar power plant which was +planned to be built down the road from us. The reason we do is that the same people who were pushing for it, are the +exact same people are actively involved in both acts. The second occuring as a self righteous and unjustifiable act of +revenge, because we dared to try to save our family's home. + +We faced a lot of opposition for what we were claiming, and efforts were made to publicly ridicule and belittle us. +Since, we have remained in a steadfast stream of various attempts to defame our reputation, expose us to public +ridicule, and make it appear as if we are some unhinged lying lunatic. While the entire time, not once have our +persecutors actually taken the time to address any part of our research, or attempted to counter it with viable +authoritative research of their own. + +Well, in July of this past year, the nation of Italy provided us with some much deserved vindication. As Italy became +one of the first european countries to ban construction of solar power plants with ground mounted panels. They did so +citing concerns over the permanent loss of productive farmland over this form of installation. + +The type of solar power plant Italy banned, is exactly the same type of solar power plant we were persecuted for +opposing. Even worse, is the reason Italy banned them, is exactly what we were ridiculed for claiming. So in the end, +we were right in our opposition. The group of individuals who came after our family and destroyed our home, no longer +have an excuse they can claim. They can't justify what they did to us. They can't use it to explain their violations of +numerous laws, their performing favors for friends a.k.a "quid pro quo", or their use of tax payer funds to fuel a +private vindetta. diff --git a/content/persons/_index.md b/content/persons/_index.md index 081bbfc..6f0019a 100644 --- a/content/persons/_index.md +++ b/content/persons/_index.md @@ -9,12 +9,7 @@ draft: false type: docs categories: Person weight: 1 -thumbnail: - url: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1726086548/Memes/von-mises_xsgylz.jpg - author: "" - authorURL: "" - origin: Unsplash - originURL: "" +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1726086548/Memes/von-mises_xsgylz.jpg modules: "" fmContentType: person alias: @@ -22,16 +17,9 @@ alias: - /persons_involved --- -{{< image src="https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1726086548/Memes/von-mises_xsgylz.jpg" wrapper="col-6 mx-auto" >}} - -Since 2016, the same group of individuals have twice used less than scrupulous methods to attack our home, regardless of intentionality. Each time possessed the same attributes of a desire to circumvent regular channels and steps often required by law to achieve a particular goal, a conserved effort to with hold information from our family and the public, the bending of law to align with one's own personal will, and a slew of "lesser" illegal activities, which alone are not offensive enough to pursue, but taken as a whole become too numerous to prosecute. - -The first time this occurred, an effort was made to not expose these individuals in public, those exposed were public officials at the time or their association to the affair was a matter of public information and/or were included by free publication. We avoided mentioning names and abstained from attacking someone personally, because not only is it in poor taste, but it takes the focus off of the position of one's argument, and redirects it to the individual. - -The second time this occurred, not only was it fairly evident the intent was to target and inflict harm on our home and family in order to make us "pay" for some ill-conceived vendetta, but from the beginning the attack has remained too organized and well coordinated for it not to have been contrived with premeditated machination. The obvious smear campaign performed by these individuals, their willingness to disregard federal law as they see fit, and the expressed lack of concern for upholding the dignity of their offices do sincerely pose a risk to the safety and welfare of the community, because there is absolutely nothing preventing them from doing it again to someone else whenever they feel like it. - -It is for this reason, we can no longer protect someone from the truth by which they are themselves the author of, while -remaining within the confines of legal permissibility. +This is not "doxing", doxing is much more severe and intrusive. Doxing is performed with the intent of publicly +disclosing personal information that would lead to harm and place the safety of the target in jeopardy. This is sharing +the names of individuals who were present during and event or experience.