From b62c248e5d5db7c2eed430a477b8285e35551bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <11767-anoduck@users.noreply.gitgud.io> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: Finally emails working now --- content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html | 136 ------------------------- 1 file changed, 136 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html (limited to 'content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html') diff --git a/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html b/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html deleted file mode 100644 index 26c7397..0000000 --- a/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,136 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - Email Message: C - - - - - - - -

a matter of clarification, please

-
----
-author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
-subject: a matter of clarification, please
-message-id: CAGiqvQmuYOOMjA4T
-date: 2024-03-07
----
-
- -

That does not bode well, and leads to the suspicion of there being a -conflict of interest.

-

I don't know where you got the 15 day deadline, because on municode, which -is the link provided by the county, the oXXinance reads 30 days.

-

On the same page, it says appeals can be raised by any aggrieved member of -the community. It says nothing of the members standing. Since the offences -are committed aXXinst the county, then the individual who is appealing a -self admitted breach of OXXinance should not matter. Standing does not -dictate ethicality, nor interfere with the counties obliXXtion to enforce -penalties and violations. What it summates to is county sanctioned illeXXl -building practices.

-
-

The developers had to have known before hand the status of my grandmother's -estate, it is the only thing that can explain their reckless and obvious -intentional violation of state law. Standing can be rectified, building a -house without a valid permit cannot. Formulation of machinations in oXXer -to perform intentional negligence, most certainly cannot.

-

There is another subdivision behind us, it too has egregiously violated -state law, and even encroached on our property knowingly so. Obviously, -someone must have told him the same thing about the estate. This would mean -there is communication and cooXXination between the two parties. Someone -had to tell them all, and there are a finite number of people who could -have done so.

-

The entire oXXeal revolves around ethical duty, not leXXl maneuverability. -Cheating and cutting corners is no way to do the right thing, no matter the -desired result.

-

Now you know the reason for asking. A terrible wrong has been done to my -family, and I am obliXXted by duty to rectify this injustice, leXXlly and -ethically.

-

XXXXXXX

-

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 2:37 PM L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com -wrote:

-
-

I am not going to answer this.

-

Sincerely,

-

L. Scott Mayfield​​​​

-

Attorney at Law

-

O.770-358-XX30

-

|

-

F. 770-358-XX40

-

XXX Thomaston Street

-

|

-

XXXXXXXXXXX

-

,

-

GA

-

30204

-

www.smithwelchlaw.com

-

Coronavirus Statement https://smithwelchlaw.com/covid-statement

-

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its attachments are for -the sole use of the designated recipient(s). They may contain confidential -information, leXXlly privileged information or other information subject to -leXXl restrictions. If you are not a designated recipient of this message, -please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this message or its attachments, -notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all -copies of this message and attachments in all media. No attorney/client -relationship shall be created as a result of this communication. No -attorney/client relationship shall exist absent a written retainer -agreement. Thank you.

-

From: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com -Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 6:57 AM -To: L. Scott Mayfield smayfield@smithwelchlaw.com; -rtraylor@lamarcountyXX.com; XXXXXX XXXXXX aXXXXXX@lamarcountyXX.com; -Mom Elisa XXXXXX gratefulXXXXenur@gmail.com -Subject: A matter of clarification, please

-

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the firm. Do not click -links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the -content is safe.

-

Scott,

-

Are you currently representing or retained by any of the following:

- -

As this would represent a conflict of interest, and someone is obviously -counseling these individuals, and performing the leXXl work needed for the -exchange of land. There are only two real estate attorneys in town that I -am aware of, and your response primarily protects their interests.

-

XXXXXXX -

-
-

References

-

['CAGiqvQmO2mpD8WJR']

-

Reply-To

-

BN8PR05MB6610D337

-
-

Back

-
-

:END:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3