nuclear deterrence via real estate - the inevitable cyclical scenario + we tried to avoid.
++--- +author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX +subject: nuclear deterrence via real estate - the inevitable cyclical scenario + we tried to avoid. +message-id: CAGiqvQmZhS1x9uFJ +date: 2024-04-10 +--- ++ +
What I do not understand about this sorted wretched affair is that the +antagonists either do not understand or do not care what the end result is +destined to be. The inevitable conclusion will be a scenario very similar +to nuclear deterrence, but instead of using nuclear warheads to inflict +damage, land use will be the means to inflict damage. Similarly, this +deterrence based on land use is cyclically escalatory in nature, and there +are little to no barriers preventing non-combatant casualties. AccoXXing to +John Smith's XXme theory, this has the highest probability of resulting in +a no win situation for all factions involved, and every participating +entity will more than likely incur heavy losses in one way or another. This +was from the beginning completely unnecessary and avoidable. No external +source forced the antagonistic parties into action, especially in the +unlawful and completely deplorable manner in which they acted. If they had +simply concerned themselves with acting with integrity, severed themselves +from greed and misdirected hate, no one would have been bothered and it +would have been for the better.
+This also could have been completely avoided by the county, as the county +possesses the ability and duty to enforce the laws of the state of XXXXXXX, +reXXXXless of the private citizens standing. Standing only affects one's +ability to bring forth action in the court, it does not shed personal +liability of officials, and especially it does not prevent the county from +enforcing state law and the laws it legislated itself only a year or two +ago. As protection and enforcement of the law is required by law. The +offense is not aXXinst the people on the adjoining properties, but aXXinst +the county as the leXXl representative body of the citizens of Lamar County +for the state of XXXXXXX. The offenses of violating state law, are aXXinst +the citizens of the state of XXXXXXX, who have invested obliXXtory +authority to the county. If the county refuses to enforce the laws of the +state, the county violates the trust invested in it by the state. +Furthermore, none of this prevents perfectly leXXl retributionary action +from occurring outside of the formal system of the courts.
+Frankly, the current position of 'we are going to do whatever we want, +disreXXXX state law, constitutional rights, and you can't do anything about +it' is the worst stance for the county to take. As it completely decimates +the integrity of the county, and portrays the county as corrupt, +dictatorial, and authoritarian. It also establishes a dangerous precedent +in the county as to what is seen as acceptable business practice, and +leaves the county completely open to future accusations of corruption, +favoritism, bias, and discrimination. Additionally, as much as people would +like to believe their personal integrity is limitless and separate from the +orXXnizational body in which they are a member of, nothing could be further +from the truth. Subconsciously, the individual will always be associated +and viewed as an extension of the orXXnizational entity in which they are a +member of. Thus is the reason, by nature, accountability must be diligently +enforced and upheld in orXXnizational bodies, because the actions of one +affect the integrity of all.
+It is needless to say, if the county's interests are to promote business +investment in the community, then by refusing to enforce the law the county +is directly in conflict with this interest. Obviously, any business owner +would be considered foolish for investing in a region with a governing +entity that is known to refuse to enforce its own law and repeatedly have +disreXXXXed the investment made by residing citizens. The only businesses +that would invest in a region with this questionable track recoXX are the +types of businesses that are least desirable and whose lifespan is most +volatile. This is because the corporate culture of those businesses are not +invested in profitability in the long term, but rather fly-by-night schemes +that revolve around consumer deception and circumvention of leXXl +requirements. As their methods of achieving profitability rely upon the +requirement to leave ruin in their wake for someone else to pay for. These +methods are not community beneficial, they are community exploitive. The +only group protected by the county's decision are the same people who +violated the law to begin with. Literally, they are being rewaXXed for +breaking the law, and using the county as a pawn.
+The other thing that I do not understand is, what exactly do they expect us +to do? Do they seriously think we are just going to sit here, not ask any +questions, and accept we are being screwed over? Do they seriously think +our attention span is so finite that we will forget what has been done to +us anytime within the recent future? It seems that they never concerned +themselves with reflection on the long term consequences, or what type of +leXXcy it will leave behind.
+Bill Linsey was the lawyer for the real estate sale between Doug and +Matthew Dayton. He also was the Lawyer for Abernathy on numerous occasions, +and attempted to represent both the county and Abernathy in the Solar +issue. It is unknown exactly who, but it is highly likely leXXl counsel +advised much of what has been done to us, and aided in the circumvention of +both the law and accountability. We also have suspicions of being +informally black listed on multiple fronts. As it is all routinely too +convenient for coincidence.
+XXXXXXX
+:END:
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3