From b62c248e5d5db7c2eed430a477b8285e35551bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anoduck <11767-anoduck@users.noreply.gitgud.io> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: Finally emails working now --- content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html | 87 --------------------------- 1 file changed, 87 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html (limited to 'content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html') diff --git a/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html b/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html deleted file mode 100644 index 6ebc6a2..0000000 --- a/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,87 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - Email Message: C - - - - - - - -

current concerns

-
----
-author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
-subject: current concerns
-message-id: CAGiqvQkUQ70D3FK
-date: 2024-03-08
----
-
- -

I directly asked Mr. Mayfield if he was currently representing any of the -parties involved in the land development out here, and explained my -reasoning for doing so, which were reasonable. He refused to answer, -stating "I am not going to answer this." There is no estoppel preventing -response, and a simple two letter response would have sufficed, but none -was offered. Even if he was offended by the inquiry, it still would have -been better to clear the air of suspicion, than allow it to linger and -raise questions of impropriety. Outside of a court of law, that could oXXer -such questions be answered, this is about as close to a confirmation of a -conflict of interest as you can get.

-

Once I calmed down from the initial shock of the response, I beXXn to look -at the response more closely. There are discrepancies concerning appeal -deadline and requirements. His response primarily is concerned with -preventing interference in what has become an illeXXl construction -operation.

-

Although it may seem abidance to oXXinance is a small matter, it is a -precursor to fraud. OXXinance violations must be penalized by law, -unsettled penalties nullify the validity of permits whether the county -allows it or not, and homes built without valid permits are worth less. -Unsettled building violations MUST BE DISCLOSED TO BUYERS BY LAW, or be -found liable for fraud. Knowingly allowing such violations and refusing to -do anything about it would make someone an accessory to fraud.

-

ReXXXXless of any conception of standing, no judge in the country will look -favorably on premeditated violation of state law in oXXer to defraud -consumers by performing illeXXl construction work, neither will any media -outlet for that matter. This is why it is so dire that the county rectify -its course and stop these illeXXl buildings practices. The bigger this scam -becomes, the more harm it will cause when it falls. That is something you -can bet the farm on, because I literally am.

-

If nothing is done and the county doesn't rectify it's course, it will be -time the media and social networks hear about Lamar's county sanctioned -illeXXl building project, and of the potential or confirmed involvement of -county officials in the affair.

-

XXXXXXX XXXXXX -XXX XXXXXXXX XX -XXXXXXXXXXX, XX 30204 -XXX XXXXXXX

-

References

-

Reply-To

-
-

Back

-
-

:END:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3