diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/posts/stupid_answer.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/posts/stupid_answer.md | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/stupid_answer.md b/content/posts/stupid_answer.md index 50a75db..35343a9 100644 --- a/content/posts/stupid_answer.md +++ b/content/posts/stupid_answer.md @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ --- title: Correction for a stupid Answer. +slug: stupid_answer description: When trying to be polite, was not the right decision. date: 2024-09-20T15:58:23-04:00 type: article @@ -24,4 +25,4 @@ The guy was obviously not informed, or he wouldn't have asked such an apparently Within an hour of the interaction, we realized the gentleman was playing us for a fool, and was intentionally trying to trick us. He was going to turn right around and tell every one in town that we really didn't believe in anything we had stood up for. At the time, we hoped that anyone with a nickel's worth of sense would have been able to rationalize their way through the conflicting messages. Our greatest fault in the incident is we had possessed too much faith in humanity. Within hours people started to drive by the house staring us down. Our act of charity and desire to not get in an argument would be used as fodder for a smear campaign against our family. -Throughout everything that has happened to us since 2016, never once did anyone actually read the material provided in our references, and attack those references. Sure, Charles called an "expert" in renewable energy, the guy was an expert in biomass renewables (burning of woodchips), not photovoltaics. So, he was outside of his area of expertise, but the newspaper left that little tidbit out. He did not read, nor was he familiar with our references either. We know, because we emailed him and asked him so. Instead, everyone did what simple minded people do, they attacked our integrity and smeared our name. Weak minded people do this, because they are incapable of formulating a valid argument in defense of their claims.
\ No newline at end of file +Throughout everything that has happened to us since 2016, never once did anyone actually read the material provided in our references, and attack those references. Sure, Charles called an "expert" in renewable energy, the guy was an expert in biomass renewables (burning of woodchips), not photovoltaics. So, he was outside of his area of expertise, but the newspaper left that little tidbit out. He did not read, nor was he familiar with our references either. We know, because we emailed him and asked him so. Instead, everyone did what simple minded people do, they attacked our integrity and smeared our name. Weak minded people do this, because they are incapable of formulating a valid argument in defense of their claims. |