diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/persons/smayfield.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/persons/smayfield.md | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/persons/smayfield.md b/content/persons/smayfield.md index eb57cfa..46352d5 100644 --- a/content/persons/smayfield.md +++ b/content/persons/smayfield.md @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ type: docs categories: - Persons weight: 30 +draft: false --- {{< persona title="Scott Mayfield" color="secondary" thumbnail="https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1728579484/persons/pixelArt-1728579012305.webp" >}} @@ -27,4 +28,4 @@ His argumentation for the refusal was rather odd, because it did not protect the We do know Mayfield was employed as county attorney while also being employed as the attorney for the county waste management authority, which presented a conflict of interest when the county began to look into the finances of the waste management authority. We do know that attorneys face extremely strict standards when it comes to conflicts of interests, and that his involvement as representing both parties resulted in him being relieved of his duties by the waste authority. -All of this raises suspicion over his involvement in the affair. As mentioned throughout this site, except for having a signed confession, all signs point to the involvement of an unscrupulous legal counsel. Why would he protect the developers and not uphold the law while protecting the county, unless he was somehow involved with the developers? When asked this, Mr. Mayfield did not deny it, he simply stated "I will not answer that." Which, as pointed out to him, does not bring an end to the suspicions regarding this matter, but if anything, increases them. +All of this raises suspicion over his involvement in the affair. As mentioned throughout this site, except for having a signed confession, all signs point to the involvement of an unscrupulous legal counsel. Why would he protect the developers and not uphold the law while protecting the county, unless he was somehow involved with the developers? When asked this, Mr. Mayfield did not deny it, he simply stated "I will not answer that." Which, as pointed out to him, does not bring an end to the suspicions regarding this matter, but if anything, increases it. |