diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/legal/illegit-sale.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/legal/illegit-sale.md | 20 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/content/legal/illegit-sale.md b/content/legal/illegit-sale.md index 65d8e07..47a8c21 100644 --- a/content/legal/illegit-sale.md +++ b/content/legal/illegit-sale.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- -title: Illegitimate Real Estate Sales -description: Covers the illegitimate sales practices of the Fire Chief. +title: Illegitimate Real Estate Deal +description: Covering the illegitimate and illegal real estate deal of the Fire Chief. date: 2024-10-14T01:23:36-04:00 type: docs draft: true @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ fmContentType: Legal categories: - Legal thumbnail: - url: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1729060425/photo-1490139753981-d33e0da2c26c_x8n7rz.jpg - originURL: https://unsplash.com/photos/person-giving-something-to-man-ejpzqDLBFiA + url: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1727418922/legal/photo-1607038072407-a2fe22551a0d_sxpqxk.jpg + originURL: https://unsplash.com/photos/grayscale-photo-of-rabbit-plush-toy-bCA_0q625Qw origin: Unsplash - author: Ben White - authorURL: https://unsplash.com/@benwhitephotography + author: Robert Gourley + authorURL: https://unsplash.com/@robertgourley slug: legitimacy-claims --- @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ This event was another instance of witnessing hundreds of red flags going up int Contacting Dayton was an unforeseen obstacle, as what ever had happened to him was still a mystery, and obviously one that was being kept as to prevent anyone from finding out. We never knew his cellular number, as we have never needed it, and obviously writing him again at the same address would not be productive since Doug was squatting there. So, the there were only two possible options left, one was to hunt down one of Dayton's sons and inquire about the situation, and the other was to try to reach him at the address of his house in town. At the time, we still were still holding onto the fabricated and false idea given to us by Shane, which was Dayton was merely "tired" of living out in the country. So, believing the house in town was where Dayton was or would be residing, we decided to try to contact him there. -By this time, the son of one our closest family friends had lied to us when he claimed he did not know what was going on with Dayton's properties and he know nothing about what had happened to Dayton. We knew he was not truthful, because he is a realtor and was listing the other property owned by Dayton in town at the time. In real estate terms, the intent to mislead someone over the availability of a property is referred to as a breach of fiduciary duty, and can cause realtors to lose their licenses. Since he was listing the other property in town, he would have had to had a signed listing agreement with the owner of the property, which was still Dayton according to county records. +<!-- Here is where I left off. --> + +By this time, the son of one our closest family friends had lied to us when he claimed he did not know what was going on with Dayton's properties and he knew nothing about what had happened to Dayton. We knew he was not truthful, because he was Dayton's next door neighbor on the opposite side, and he was the realtor listing the other property owned by Dayton in town at the time. In real estate terms, the intent to mislead someone over the availability of a property is referred to as a breach of fiduciary duty [^1], and it alone can cause realtors to lose their licenses, but unfortunately his involvement was deeper than this. In order for real estate agents to list a property they often require an listing agreement between the client (seller) and themselves (a representative of the real estate brokering firm). So, either Dayton himself of someone with power of attorney would have had to meet with him and sign the listing agreement. So, he new perfectly well what was going on, and Doug would be brokering the other property himself. Why it was decided that Doug would broker the other property is not known. But as a licensed realtor, entering into a contractual agreement with such knowledge does not since he knew the other property was being brokered in a manner that is contrary to state law, by an individual whose intent was to receive quantitative benefit for acting in this manner, he should have either insisted that the other property from not only a representative of their real estate brokerage, but of the realtors association as well, and as such are bound to perform it is their obligation as members of the association to ensure all property of your All of which makes it clearly evident he was involved in whatever was Enough had happened to us, to where we had little belief that any attempt to contact Dayton would be reciprocated. After succumbing to a debilitating onset of procrastination over the matter, we finally gathered ourselves enough to act on it. So, in a fit of self determination we forced ourselves to write a letter inquiring about sale of the property. @@ -62,4 +64,6 @@ In retrospect, it is unclear if contacting one of his Dayton's would have made a The point of relating all of this is to confront claims of legitimacy regarding both Shane's and Doug's acquisition of the property. If we had been more aware that we were getting cheated and being lied to, and if we were more knowledgeable of state laws and the statute of limitations regarding brokering real estate unlawfully, we probably could have done something about it. Although, now, their ownership of the property is unquestionable, the means by which they acquired ownership by crookery is unscrupulous and illegitimate by comparison of normal means. After all, when you ask someone how they acquired their house, and they respond, 'oh, I made an underhanded deal to cheat the neighbor out of purchasing it, and then tried to run him off his own land.' Anyone with a modicum of decency would refrain themselves from referring to it as a legitimate acquisition. -Debatably, the nature by which both properties were acquired, and the intent to manipulate or mislead others in order to prevent or prohibit them from protecting their own personal property and investments, should have some impact on the legal aspects of the situation. As our legal system is designed in order to prevent individuals from profiting for illegal and fraudulent acts.
\ No newline at end of file +Debatably, the nature by which both properties were acquired, and the intent to manipulate or mislead others in order to prevent or prohibit them from protecting their own personal property and investments, should have some impact on the legal aspects of the situation. As our legal system is designed in order to prevent individuals from profiting for illegal and fraudulent acts. + +[^1]: O.C.G.A. � 10-6A-4 (Lexis Advance through 2024 Regular and Extraordinary Session of the General Assembly)
\ No newline at end of file |