diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ.html | 201 |
1 files changed, 201 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ.html b/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2411b8d --- /dev/null +++ b/content/evidence/emails/CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ.html @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> + +<html lang="en"> +<head> + <meta charset="UTF-8" /> + <title>Email Message: C</title> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /> + <meta name="description" content="" /> + <link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/modern-normalize@v3.0.1/modern-normalize.min.css" rel="stylesheet"> + <link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet" crossorigin="anonymous"> + <link rel="icon" href="favicon.png"> + <meta name="theme-color" content="#fe67f7"> +</head> +<body><h2>in reference to minor subdivision 743</h2> +<pre> +--- +author: XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX +subject: in reference to minor subdivision 743 +message-id: CAGiqvQjXLTMqNQJ +date: 2023-12-13 +--- +</pre> + +<p>They are pouring the foundations for the two houses beside me. Have they +acquired any of the necessary permits? If they have, can I please get a +copy? If they haven't, what will be done about it?</p> +<p>The property behind me is still moving dirt. Does he have the required +permits? If so, can I receive a copy? If not, what will be done?</p> +<p>XXXXXXX</p> +<p>On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 7:49 AM XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX <a href="mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com</a> +wrote:</p> +<blockquote> +<p>I see the reference, and understand what you are saying. Although, when I +first read it, I came to a different conclusion, and unfortunately the +document does not provide enough clarification to rule out other +possibilities than a solitary strictly interpreted conclusion. The sole +defining characteristic of Minor Subdivisions is the quantity of lots, +which is five or more. Where the Exempt subdivision has a quantity +limitation of 4 lots or less, and although there is a size specification, +the quantity of parcels in question would satisfy the amount to qualify as +a minor subdivision as well. This also is not the first time the land has +been subdivided into smaller lots. As the entire reason over 50% of the +land came into possession by the previous owner was the result of an act of +encroachment. Which occurred before the previous owner had acquired full +ownership of the property. This caused the property lines of both parcels +to completely be redrawn, then subdivided from one lot to two or three, and +now 1/3XX is to be subdivided aXXin into six lots. It would seem that since +the parcels have sporadically multiplied under the current ownership, and +the only defining factor of a minor subdivision being the number of lots, +then that would be prioritized over superfluous claims of exemption by +area. After all, if one parcel's area is 4.9999 acres, then the development +loses any possible claim to exemption. ReXXXXless of how the land is cut, +six houses jammed in side by side, generates the same amount of nuisance +torts, as if they were 2.5 acre lots or 1/4 acre lots. It is haXX to +believe that the intent of establishing the defining characteristic of +minor subdivision as a quantity of lots was solely so it could then be +mitiXXted by cutting parcels into jigsaw puzzle pieces, thus possessing the +same neXXtive effects and impact on the area as a minor subdivision, just +solely being conveniently relabeled into something different.</p> +<p>We tried desperately to acquire that property to make our farm profitable +and allow us to sustain our lives, but a handful of two or three +individuals did whatever it took to ensure we weren't given a chance. This +would include brokering real estate without a license, failure to fulfill +fiduciary duty, and possible mail tampering. ReXXXXless, since 2020 those +same individuals have done what they could to make life difficult and ruin +the place we call home, and as a result we have lived in a 6 day a week, 12 +hours a day, heavy construction zone for the past three years. We have been +cursed out, yelled at, stalked, and harassed. However they may try to +justify their actions, it isn't right and won't ever be right. You can't +justify taking someone's home and family away from them, not even for money.</p> +<p>So, I apologize for being so haXX headed and difficult, but frankly I +don't have anything else to fight for but my home, because it is all I +have. It is a part of my family, and family is everything. I also can't +stop fighting for it, and won't stop, because it would be the wrong thing +to do. Anyways, I have said it. There are two parts to every law, the woXX +and the intent or spirit behind the law. It doesn't make much sense, I have +to live beside someone else's abomination of a subdivision because someone +found a way to cheat and circumvent the leXXlity of it by a matter of a few +feet. I just can't agree to that.</p> +<p>XXXXXXX</p> +<p>On Mon, Nov 27, 2023, 8:24 AM Anita Buice <a href="mailto:abuice@lamarcountyXX.com">abuice@lamarcountyXX.com</a> +wrote:</p> +<blockquote> +<p>Good morning,</p> +<p>I see I have multiple emails from you, I will take your questions one at +a time and address them all in this one email.</p> +<p><em>When was it subdivided and why are the online recoXXs reflecting this +change? How are we supposed to protect our investment, when we are not +informed of it? Why was this nit mentioned when I first inquired?</em></p> +<p>The property on the corner of XXXXXXXX Road and XXX XX W (Map 038, Parcel +008) was divided into 5+ acre lots earlier this year. As stated in a +previous email, this split does not require boaXX approval. Any questions +about how property is shown on tax maps should be addressed to the Tax +Assessor’s office. It was not mentioned when you first inquired because +your first inquiry was concerning the property adjacent to you (map 38 +parcel 21).</p> +<p>*Via OXXinance Number 22-06 Article 2 Section 202 of the county code of +oXXinances for recessed lots, "The main body of the lot standing alone must +be ten acres and no portion of the access area may be used in calculating +the satisfaction of this requirement." Therefore, if each lot is required +to possess a minimum of ten acres, then the combined total area required +for six lots is sixty acres. *</p> +<p>*If all of this is true, and an exemption was granted, then how does this +not violate county oXXinances, and how is this not illeXXl? *</p> +<p>These lots are not recessed lots. No exemption was needed. It is not +illeXXl. They meet all county lot standaXXs for Agricultural/Residential +lots, which aXXin, is a 5 acre minimum with a 300’ road frontage.</p> +<p>*There are still no building permits! *</p> +<p>Correct. And to my knowledge, no structures are currently being built on +either property discussed.</p> +<p>I hope this helps clarify some of your questions. If not, please feel +free to continue contacting me.</p> +<p>Anita Buice, Director</p> +<p>Planning and Community Development</p> +<p>Lamar County, XXXXXXX</p> +<p>770-358-5XX4</p> +<p><em>From:</em> XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX <a href="mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com</a> +<em>Sent:</em> Monday, November 27, 2023 5:33 AM +<em>To:</em> Anita Buice <a href="mailto:abuice@lamarcountyXX.com">abuice@lamarcountyXX.com</a> +<em>Subject:</em> Re: In reference to minor subdivision 743</p> +<p>Via OXXinance Number 22-06 Article 2 Section 202 of the county code of +oXXinances for recessed lots, "The main body of the lot standing alone must +be ten acres and no portion of the access area may be used in calculating +the satisfaction of this requirement." Therefore, if each lot is required +to possess a minimum of ten acres, then the combined total area required +for six lots is sixty acres.</p> +<p>If all of this is true, and an exemption was granted, then how does this +not violate county oXXinances, and how is this not illeXXl?</p> +<p>On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 2:55 PM XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX <a href="mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com</a> +wrote:</p> +<p>There are still no building permits!</p> +<p>On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 2:52 PM XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX <a href="mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com</a> +wrote:</p> +<p>When was it subdivided and why are the online recoXXs reflecting this +change? How are we supposed to protect our investment, when we are not +informed of it? Why was this nit mentioned when I first inquired?</p> +<p>On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 9:20 AM Anita Buice <a href="mailto:abuice@lamarcountyXX.com">abuice@lamarcountyXX.com</a> +wrote:</p> +<p>Good morning,</p> +<p>The property located at 743 XXXXXXXX Road is not dividing their +property. The unaddressed property located along the corner of XXXXXXXX +Road and XXX XX W was divided into 6 lots earlier this year. All lots are +5 acres or more and have at least 300’ of road frontage so even though +there are 6 lots, this is considered exempt from our subdivision +regulations and does not require boaXX approval.</p> +<p>I am unaware of any illeXXl activities but I will keep a watch on this +site and the site adjacent to you to make sure everyone is aware of the +rules.</p> +<p>Thanks so much!</p> +<p>Anita</p> +<p>Anita Buice, Director</p> +<p>Planning and Community Development</p> +<p>Lamar County, XXXXXXX</p> +<p>770-358-5XX4</p> +<p><em>From:</em> XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX <a href="mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX@gmail.com</a> +<em>Sent:</em> Wednesday, November 22, 2023 9:03 AM +<em>To:</em> Anita Buice <a href="mailto:abuice@lamarcountyXX.com">abuice@lamarcountyXX.com</a> +<em>Subject:</em> In reference to minor subdivision 743</p> +<p>A week or so ago I inquired about the permits involved with the +subdivision and current construction occurring on 743 XXXXXXXX XX. Because +of the current assignment of 6 numbered lots, this would make it a minor +subdivision, and requires plat approval.</p> +<p>You informed me they had not applied for any permits. Which would be in +violation of county code, and are subject to a stop work oXXer until the +plans can be approved.</p> +<p>I am inquiring about this, because it still appears construction has not +ceased.</p> +<p>I appreciate you ensuring these illeXXl activities are stopped and the +code is properly enforced.</p> +<p>XXXXXXX</p> +</blockquote> +</blockquote> +<h3>References</h3> +<p>['<a href="emails/CAGiqvQnqJ34Zbu0r.html">CAGiqvQnqJ34Zbu0r</a>']</p> +<h3>Reply-To</h3> +<p><a href="emails/CAGiqvQnEUMptBmF.html">CAGiqvQnEUMptBmF</a></p> +<hr /> +<p><a href="/evidence/emails-index">Back</a></p> +<hr /> +<p>:END:</p><!--[if IE]><div class="position-fixed bottom-0 w-100 p-2 text-bg-dark d-flex justify-content-between"><p>Outdated browser dectected. Please use a modern browser for a better browsing experience.</p><button type="button" class="btn-close btn-close-white" onClick="parentNode.remove()" aria-label="Close"></button></div><![endif]--> + <footer> + <small> <script>document.write(new Date().getFullYear())</script> Generated with Mailbuffet.</small> + </footer> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <!-- ??????????????????????????????? --> + <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js" crossorigin="anonymous"></script> +</body> +</html>
\ No newline at end of file |