summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/legal
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoranoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com>2025-03-28 18:33:33 -0400
committeranoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com>2025-03-28 18:36:22 -0400
commit57dcd87622abdaae205a0e4d9cc884a4e802c17c (patch)
tree578179ded2b31a591139a6c900c7f28854c61549 /content/legal
parent91b15d9fadd7308ddb68d0faeb610d1583be536b (diff)
fix(google): google 404
made modifications to prevent 404 errors with google.
Diffstat (limited to 'content/legal')
-rw-r--r--content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md33
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md b/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..77eaf14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: How the county cheated us out of our home.
+description: Recent aired commercial provides analogy for how the county screwed us.
+date: 2025-03-25T20:29:54.568Z
+tags:
+ - law
+ - legal
+ - estate
+categories: Legal
+type: docs
+draft: false
+alias: []
+thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742934809/legal/maxresdefault.jpg
+fmContentType: legal
+---
+
+Many of you will recognize this commercial recently aired on many television channels. It shows an expecting couple
+expressing their desire for a friend to be the guardian of their soon to be born child. Then out of nowhere a man popups
+to remind them how expressing the desire is not enough to make it count legally.
+
+This commercial provides an excellent analogy as to how the county evaded accountability and was allowed to grant favors
+for friends, conceal public information, screw taxpayers out of millions in potential earnings, and screwed our family
+out of our home. Which is, regardless of being a legal executor to the estate of our parents, the county could (and did)
+legally do anything they wanted and we could not do anything about it. We probably would have had more legal options if
+we were merely squaters on someone elses property (like the chief was).
+
+Regardless of it being premeditated, us living there our entire life, or having cared for the home for over ten years
+out of our own finances, according to "the law" as we were told, we had no property rights to our own home. We do also
+own a property next door, but the zoning administrator made sure to drag things long enough so the statute of
+limitations expired.
+
+{{< youtube 29sndj15Tbg >}}
+