summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/legal/premeditation.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoranoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com>2024-11-21 06:15:15 -0500
committeranoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com>2024-11-21 06:15:15 -0500
commit4530da3162b4fef7103871759e8d17c3f8a2758b (patch)
treea92cd990e328943dd663715f3ba076242b314400 /content/legal/premeditation.md
parent6892666778ef20e31eea669ea5932f759626fdf0 (diff)
docs: :memo: Removed off subject otter logs
Updated packages, Removed off subject otter logs.
Diffstat (limited to 'content/legal/premeditation.md')
-rw-r--r--content/legal/premeditation.md27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/legal/premeditation.md b/content/legal/premeditation.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1a61cb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/legal/premeditation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+---
+title: Premeditation
+description: Signs of premeditation
+date: 2024-11-20T20:47:06.324Z
+tags: []
+categories: Legal
+type: docs
+draft: true
+alias: []
+thumbnail:
+ url: ""
+ author: ""
+ authorURL: ""
+ origin: ""
+ originURL: ""
+fmContentType: legal
+---
+
+> No one bats 1,000, especially not these guys.
+
+### Analogy: Blind mouse finding cheese.
+
+We have all heard the analogy "Even a blind mouse will find a piece of cheese now and again." Now, imagine what would happen if every time the blind mouse went out to find a piece of cheese it was successful, __no matter what the circumstances were__. You would eventually come to the conclusion that either the mouse isn't blind at all, or there was something guiding him to the cheese. This analogy describes exactly how events have unfolded for us. The home burners not only knew what to do and how to do it, but they knew how to avoid being held accountable for doing it. It would be the same as if every time you and your friend went fishing, he would catch the biggest fish in the lake. Eventually, you would either discover he was a famously renowned angular, he was cheating somehow, or he was purchasing the biggest fish at the market and carrying it out on the lake with him. No one is that lucky on their own, someone had to sit back and plan it all through to guarantee success, and that person had to have been a lawyer.
+
+### No one bats 1000
+
+What happened is really beyond the probabilities of coincidence, which is why the analogy of the blind mouse fails to fully express the statistical conditions involved in the situation. As for the mouse, it is a hit or miss scenario, for a better analogy one would need to look at the statistical fact that no baseball player could ever have a 1000 batting average. Major League baseball players, the exceptionally good ones, \ No newline at end of file