diff options
| author | anoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com> | 2025-03-28 18:33:33 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | anoduck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com> | 2025-03-28 18:36:22 -0400 |
| commit | 57dcd87622abdaae205a0e4d9cc884a4e802c17c (patch) | |
| tree | 578179ded2b31a591139a6c900c7f28854c61549 /content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md | |
| parent | 91b15d9fadd7308ddb68d0faeb610d1583be536b (diff) | |
fix(google): google 404
made modifications to prevent 404 errors with google.
Diffstat (limited to 'content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md b/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..77eaf14 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/legal/analogy-does-not-count.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +--- +title: How the county cheated us out of our home. +description: Recent aired commercial provides analogy for how the county screwed us. +date: 2025-03-25T20:29:54.568Z +tags: + - law + - legal + - estate +categories: Legal +type: docs +draft: false +alias: [] +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742934809/legal/maxresdefault.jpg +fmContentType: legal +--- + +Many of you will recognize this commercial recently aired on many television channels. It shows an expecting couple +expressing their desire for a friend to be the guardian of their soon to be born child. Then out of nowhere a man popups +to remind them how expressing the desire is not enough to make it count legally. + +This commercial provides an excellent analogy as to how the county evaded accountability and was allowed to grant favors +for friends, conceal public information, screw taxpayers out of millions in potential earnings, and screwed our family +out of our home. Which is, regardless of being a legal executor to the estate of our parents, the county could (and did) +legally do anything they wanted and we could not do anything about it. We probably would have had more legal options if +we were merely squaters on someone elses property (like the chief was). + +Regardless of it being premeditated, us living there our entire life, or having cared for the home for over ten years +out of our own finances, according to "the law" as we were told, we had no property rights to our own home. We do also +own a property next door, but the zoning administrator made sure to drag things long enough so the statute of +limitations expired. + +{{< youtube 29sndj15Tbg >}} + |
