diff options
| author | Anoduck, The Anonymous Duck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com> | 2025-03-25 06:25:38 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-03-25 06:25:38 +0000 |
| commit | 11d3181eedd5b9fe804e6483eef683360ba13a77 (patch) | |
| tree | 013d9d0d7c601c1007c8eba823b4b7a37d3e7897 /content/evidence | |
| parent | 40ae43a314222c9b8fd5800cbcc0c7a78b3b250d (diff) | |
| parent | 91b15d9fadd7308ddb68d0faeb610d1583be536b (diff) | |
Merge pull request #89 from anoduck/develop
docs: Added content, updated mods
Diffstat (limited to 'content/evidence')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/evidence/mail-tampering.md | 117 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | content/evidence/timeline.md | 4 |
2 files changed, 120 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ace152c --- /dev/null +++ b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +--- +title: Isn't that something called "Tampering with the mail"? +description: Request made to investigate tampering with the U.S.P.S. Mail. +date: 2022-09-19T19:00:00.000Z +metadata: full +categories: Evidence +tags: + - law + - accountability +thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742464545/Communication/photo-1694442480933-fd8032cbef30.jpg +type: docs +draft: false +alias: [] +modules: "" +fmContentType: evidence +--- + +## Suspicion + +We had always been suspicious as to why our former neighbor of forty five years never responded to any of our inquiries concerning +the property he had owned across the street from us. The reasons for the suspicion were, + +1. We were already concerned about his well being, since we had not seen him in several months. +2. We knew the fire chief was residing at his home, had not purchased it, and was intentionally preventing anyone from + finding out. +3. We knew information about the future of the property was intentionally being witheld from us. Which constitutes an + intention to decieve. + +Then the fire chief disclosed he was aware of the contents of these letters, which he did not have a right to. They were +private communications between Mr. Dayton and ourself. No one else had permission to read them, not even Mr. Dayton's +son Matthews. + +## Possibilities + +So this left us with one of three possibilities as to how Doug Matthews acquired knowledge of the content of those +letters. + +1. Mr. Dayton read them and did not respond, but yet told Doug about the contents. +2. Doug intercepted the letters and read them himself. +3. Mr. Dayton's son intercepted the letters, and informed Doug. + + We could easily dismiss one of those possibilities, Mr. Dayton would not have shared that information with +Doug, and if possibile Mr. Dayton would have responded if he had actually recieved them. Mr. Dayton was a businessman, +and especially as one who started out in sales, he took care of business, and was one to communicate. Which meant +probability favored Mr. Dayton never recieved those letters. This did not answer how Doug was informed on the content +of those letters, but it did bring up another important inquiry. If Mr. Dayton did not recieve them, who did? + +## The role of Covid + +There is one other point of information which supports the scenario that Mr. Dayton never informed Doug about the +content of our letters to him. Mr. Dayton was hospitalized with covid 19 during the height of the epidemic. The method +for treating covid patients at that time was to place them under strict quarantine and when needed place them on a +respirator. Since Doug is in no way related to Mr. Dayton, he would not qualify to recieve any visitation rights. + +So, it was not possible for Doug to even see Mr. Dayton at the time. This meant that either someone else was granting Doug +permission to begin liquidating Mr. Dayton's assets and live on his property rent free, Doug was doing so unlawfully +as a squatter, or most likely a combination of both. Either way, Mr. Dayton had a pack of grandchildren, who appear to have been +cheated out of part of their inheritance by our county's second highest ranking public safety officer. + +## Inheritance is sentimental + +Inheritance is more than just monetary possession, it's deeply sentimental and personal. Doug living in his house before +his passing, would have robbed them of their privacy, any chance of purchasing the property themselves, and any chance +to claim anything they deamed sentimental. Considering the greediness and crookedness in which every aspect of this has +unfolded, it is certain the entire purpose for him to have moved onto Dayton's property in a clandestine manner was to +do exactly this, cheat Mr. Dayton's relatives out of their inheritance. + +Only a very cunning and ultimately crooked legal counselor could have advised Doug on how to do this without being held +in negligence. This is where county commissioner Truman Boyle and his associate, the county attorney Scott Mayfield most +likely played a role. Because someone had to be giving Doug legal advice, and no attorney would assisst a complete +stranger in planning out a means to cheat a family out of their inheritance. Which meant Doug had to have known the +attorney personally. Since his father-in-law is friends with Scott, Scott attends the same church as Doug, Scott is +the county attorney, and has a history of disregarding matters which possess a conflict of interest. So, Scott was +obviously the best fit for this role. + +## Sons + +So, returning to what happened to those letters. this leaves us with either Doug intercepted the letters or one of Mr. +Dayton's sons acquired possession of them. So the next step was finding out about how to contact Mr. Dayton's sons. + +Research was performed in an attempt to locate contact information for Mr. Dayton's sons. One was out in Texas, most of +them were living close to one another in Atlanta, and his youngest son Matt was living here in town at the exact same +address as his father was listed as living. So, by mailing the letters to his father, they also arrived at Matt's +residence. This increased the possibility of Matt having intercepted them, and decreased the likelihood of Doug having +performed the interception out of practicality. + +There is one other piece of information supporting this scenario, Mr. Dayton's oldest son, Bill Dayton, was contacted to +inquire about what had happened to the letters mailed to his father. Over the very brief correspondance that took place, +three things came across most evident. + +1. There was an undercurrent of agitation over the subject. +2. Regardless of being Mr. Dayton's oldest, and having been a former employee of his father's business, + Bill was somehow disassociated with the estate. It appears the other brothers, except Matt, were as well. +3. He was completely unaware of the numerous attempts to contact his father, and knew nothing of Doug liquidating the + estate. + +This left us with the highest possible scenario being, Matt intercepted the letters, opened them, and then informed Doug +of their contents. Mr. Dayton died completely unaware that his neighbor of forty five years was desperately trying to +reach him to save his own home from what inevitably was to come. Afterwards, they more than likely were disposed in the +trash, a symbol of what his son did to a life long friendship. + +## Legality + +Within all of this are two federal felonies to add to the list: + +1. Obstruction of Correspondence [^2] +2. Delay or Destruction of Mail or Newspapers [^3] + +By intercepting the letters and not informing his father of their existence, Matt Dayton obstructed a critical +correspondence between us and his father, and then by destroying and/or refusing to forward then to his father, he +destroyed the mail. + +We are constantly confounded by the unwillingness of law enforcement to do anything about this illegal sham. + +[^1]: https://legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-open-someone-elses-mailbox/ +[^2]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702 +[^3]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1703
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/evidence/timeline.md b/content/evidence/timeline.md index 8d803f0..5161b23 100644 --- a/content/evidence/timeline.md +++ b/content/evidence/timeline.md @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ categories: draft: false fmContentType: evidence modules: timelinejs +alias: + - docs/timeline --- > [!WARNING] @@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ modules: timelinejs ---- -__TimelineJs Should be rendered below__ +TimelineJs Should be rendered below: {{< timelinejs blockId="timeline-content" tlData="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSoEV-bT1CXcTsWDUX8ubyBH1hFb0DrokqJAfc66DQfpVBxv7JZKIPwZ3SzjBBFTADw4NAy-NvOtzma/pubhtml" >}} |
