summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/evidence
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnoduck, The Anonymous Duck <9925396+anoduck@users.noreply.github.com>2025-03-25 06:25:38 +0000
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2025-03-25 06:25:38 +0000
commit11d3181eedd5b9fe804e6483eef683360ba13a77 (patch)
tree013d9d0d7c601c1007c8eba823b4b7a37d3e7897 /content/evidence
parent40ae43a314222c9b8fd5800cbcc0c7a78b3b250d (diff)
parent91b15d9fadd7308ddb68d0faeb610d1583be536b (diff)
Merge pull request #89 from anoduck/develop
docs: Added content, updated mods
Diffstat (limited to 'content/evidence')
-rw-r--r--content/evidence/mail-tampering.md117
-rw-r--r--content/evidence/timeline.md4
2 files changed, 120 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ace152c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/evidence/mail-tampering.md
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+---
+title: Isn't that something called "Tampering with the mail"?
+description: Request made to investigate tampering with the U.S.P.S. Mail.
+date: 2022-09-19T19:00:00.000Z
+metadata: full
+categories: Evidence
+tags:
+ - law
+ - accountability
+thumbnail: https://res.cloudinary.com/solardump/image/upload/v1742464545/Communication/photo-1694442480933-fd8032cbef30.jpg
+type: docs
+draft: false
+alias: []
+modules: ""
+fmContentType: evidence
+---
+
+## Suspicion
+
+We had always been suspicious as to why our former neighbor of forty five years never responded to any of our inquiries concerning
+the property he had owned across the street from us. The reasons for the suspicion were,
+
+1. We were already concerned about his well being, since we had not seen him in several months.
+2. We knew the fire chief was residing at his home, had not purchased it, and was intentionally preventing anyone from
+ finding out.
+3. We knew information about the future of the property was intentionally being witheld from us. Which constitutes an
+ intention to decieve.
+
+Then the fire chief disclosed he was aware of the contents of these letters, which he did not have a right to. They were
+private communications between Mr. Dayton and ourself. No one else had permission to read them, not even Mr. Dayton's
+son Matthews.
+
+## Possibilities
+
+So this left us with one of three possibilities as to how Doug Matthews acquired knowledge of the content of those
+letters.
+
+1. Mr. Dayton read them and did not respond, but yet told Doug about the contents.
+2. Doug intercepted the letters and read them himself.
+3. Mr. Dayton's son intercepted the letters, and informed Doug.
+
+ We could easily dismiss one of those possibilities, Mr. Dayton would not have shared that information with
+Doug, and if possibile Mr. Dayton would have responded if he had actually recieved them. Mr. Dayton was a businessman,
+and especially as one who started out in sales, he took care of business, and was one to communicate. Which meant
+probability favored Mr. Dayton never recieved those letters. This did not answer how Doug was informed on the content
+of those letters, but it did bring up another important inquiry. If Mr. Dayton did not recieve them, who did?
+
+## The role of Covid
+
+There is one other point of information which supports the scenario that Mr. Dayton never informed Doug about the
+content of our letters to him. Mr. Dayton was hospitalized with covid 19 during the height of the epidemic. The method
+for treating covid patients at that time was to place them under strict quarantine and when needed place them on a
+respirator. Since Doug is in no way related to Mr. Dayton, he would not qualify to recieve any visitation rights.
+
+So, it was not possible for Doug to even see Mr. Dayton at the time. This meant that either someone else was granting Doug
+permission to begin liquidating Mr. Dayton's assets and live on his property rent free, Doug was doing so unlawfully
+as a squatter, or most likely a combination of both. Either way, Mr. Dayton had a pack of grandchildren, who appear to have been
+cheated out of part of their inheritance by our county's second highest ranking public safety officer.
+
+## Inheritance is sentimental
+
+Inheritance is more than just monetary possession, it's deeply sentimental and personal. Doug living in his house before
+his passing, would have robbed them of their privacy, any chance of purchasing the property themselves, and any chance
+to claim anything they deamed sentimental. Considering the greediness and crookedness in which every aspect of this has
+unfolded, it is certain the entire purpose for him to have moved onto Dayton's property in a clandestine manner was to
+do exactly this, cheat Mr. Dayton's relatives out of their inheritance.
+
+Only a very cunning and ultimately crooked legal counselor could have advised Doug on how to do this without being held
+in negligence. This is where county commissioner Truman Boyle and his associate, the county attorney Scott Mayfield most
+likely played a role. Because someone had to be giving Doug legal advice, and no attorney would assisst a complete
+stranger in planning out a means to cheat a family out of their inheritance. Which meant Doug had to have known the
+attorney personally. Since his father-in-law is friends with Scott, Scott attends the same church as Doug, Scott is
+the county attorney, and has a history of disregarding matters which possess a conflict of interest. So, Scott was
+obviously the best fit for this role.
+
+## Sons
+
+So, returning to what happened to those letters. this leaves us with either Doug intercepted the letters or one of Mr.
+Dayton's sons acquired possession of them. So the next step was finding out about how to contact Mr. Dayton's sons.
+
+Research was performed in an attempt to locate contact information for Mr. Dayton's sons. One was out in Texas, most of
+them were living close to one another in Atlanta, and his youngest son Matt was living here in town at the exact same
+address as his father was listed as living. So, by mailing the letters to his father, they also arrived at Matt's
+residence. This increased the possibility of Matt having intercepted them, and decreased the likelihood of Doug having
+performed the interception out of practicality.
+
+There is one other piece of information supporting this scenario, Mr. Dayton's oldest son, Bill Dayton, was contacted to
+inquire about what had happened to the letters mailed to his father. Over the very brief correspondance that took place,
+three things came across most evident.
+
+1. There was an undercurrent of agitation over the subject.
+2. Regardless of being Mr. Dayton's oldest, and having been a former employee of his father's business,
+ Bill was somehow disassociated with the estate. It appears the other brothers, except Matt, were as well.
+3. He was completely unaware of the numerous attempts to contact his father, and knew nothing of Doug liquidating the
+ estate.
+
+This left us with the highest possible scenario being, Matt intercepted the letters, opened them, and then informed Doug
+of their contents. Mr. Dayton died completely unaware that his neighbor of forty five years was desperately trying to
+reach him to save his own home from what inevitably was to come. Afterwards, they more than likely were disposed in the
+trash, a symbol of what his son did to a life long friendship.
+
+## Legality
+
+Within all of this are two federal felonies to add to the list:
+
+1. Obstruction of Correspondence [^2]
+2. Delay or Destruction of Mail or Newspapers [^3]
+
+By intercepting the letters and not informing his father of their existence, Matt Dayton obstructed a critical
+correspondence between us and his father, and then by destroying and/or refusing to forward then to his father, he
+destroyed the mail.
+
+We are constantly confounded by the unwillingness of law enforcement to do anything about this illegal sham.
+
+[^1]: https://legalclarity.org/is-it-illegal-to-open-someone-elses-mailbox/
+[^2]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702
+[^3]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1703 \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/content/evidence/timeline.md b/content/evidence/timeline.md
index 8d803f0..5161b23 100644
--- a/content/evidence/timeline.md
+++ b/content/evidence/timeline.md
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ categories:
draft: false
fmContentType: evidence
modules: timelinejs
+alias:
+ - docs/timeline
---
> [!WARNING]
@@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ modules: timelinejs
----
-__TimelineJs Should be rendered below__
+TimelineJs Should be rendered below:
{{< timelinejs blockId="timeline-content" tlData="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSoEV-bT1CXcTsWDUX8ubyBH1hFb0DrokqJAfc66DQfpVBxv7JZKIPwZ3SzjBBFTADw4NAy-NvOtzma/pubhtml" >}}